No Analysis Of Non-Binary On BBC Radio 4

BBC Radio 4 continued with their one-sided and uncritical coverage of transgender issues on Monday evening (May 23rd) in failing to provide any analysis of the trend on ‘Beyond Binary,’ an episode, ironically, of the ‘Analysis’ series. The presenter admitted this from the start in a breezy statement which set the tone for the whole programme:

“This episode of Analysis won’t attempt to deconstruct gender, nor will it try to define exactly what gender is and where it comes from: what it will do is explore the concept of non-binary.”

With no definition of ‘gender,’ the concept of ‘non-binary’ can’t be understood either, which perhaps explains why the BBC chose to interview exclusively people who had transitioned from one ‘gender’ to the other in varying degrees, from the use of chest binders through to surgery, plus a cross-dresser. Rather than ‘non-binary’ we got ‘binary-affirming.’ If the BBC had defined their terms before making the programme, maybe they wouldn’t have made this mistake, but as it was, the show came across as a reverent and patronising celebration of a group of people who are clearly just as confused about the meaning of ‘gender’ as the BBC is.

Phil/Pippa, a cross-dresser who has ‘come out’ at work asserts himself as being either in ‘male mode’ or in ‘female mode’ and the presenter describes his female mode thus:

“Today Pips has long blonde hair and is dressed in a smart lacy frock, tights and court shoes, a beacon of immaculate corporate femininity.”

There are many women who would take issue with that definition of ‘corporate femininity’ as a regressive stereotype, but in any case, the length of your hair and the clothes you wear is not what makes you ‘female’ (which is a biological category).  Presenting this behaviour of a middle-aged man as somehow progressive and pushing boundaries is a lie we are telling to young people, whose confusion came across clearly in the interviews. One young man who has ‘transitioned to a woman’ but sees himself as ‘not-man, not-woman’ says: ‘as soon as I saw the term ‘non-binary’ it made sense.’

A sixteen-year-old who is chest-binding and plans to have a double mastectomy says:

“When I go out in a dress I want to see myself as a boy in a dress – that’s the kind of non-binary I see myself as having.”

We have come full-circle: who is going to tell these kids there is a simpler answer, which is just to be yourself? The need to label yourself ‘transgender’ and the idea that you have to alter your body to fit your personality stems from a belief in gender stereotypes as fact for these young people. This is the story we hear every time:

“I was very tomboyish when I was younger, I wore boys’ clothes, I rejected pink and Barbies and all of those things.”

The parents’ investment in stereotypes is another feature of all the media stories we hear about ‘trans kids’ and in this case it was a daughter dressing up as a Pharoah for World Book day which was cited as an ’emotional and worrying time’ for the mother.

So far so predictable, but what marked this programme out was the casual admission of the key role of Tumblr in convincing young people that they are transgender. We are cheerfully informed that “the internet is critical; the majority find out about it online” and that “perhaps the most important social vehicle is Tumblr, the site housing millions of micro-bloggers.”

Jen Jack Giesling, a ‘non-binary New York based academic’ has collected more than a million posts with a trans hashtag as part of a research project, and says:

“There really isn’t a trans person I’ve met under the age of 30 who hasn’t been on Tumblr and hasn’t been significantly affected by the kind of images they’ve seen there and visuality, they’re sharing a lot of medical knowledge, where should I go, what surgeon should I go to, what does your surgery look like, like everyone shares surgery pictures…”

When Giesling’s surgeon sees his name as a hashtag on Tumblr, Giesling describes the moment thus:

“He could see all these people he’d done surgery on and he remembered them! It was really beautiful.”

We can only imagine how delighted he was.

This information could have been used as part of a rigorous and serious analysis of what is causing the huge increase in young people (especially teenage girls) presenting to gender clinics across the UK, but instead the credulous tone of reverence towards young people was echoed by Dr Polly Carmichael, Director of the Tavistock clinic:

“The non-binary group are challenging lots of people’s assumptions, for example if you feel you are in the wrong body and that for you you wish to realign your body to match the gender identity you feel, that is a pathway within the health system – certainly within the UK – that is well-developed. However, if you’re a non-binary person coming forward that raises some really interesting questions  – but it certainly is challenging, if you like, pre-conceived ideas of ‘this is male, this is female’ and you may have young people coming forward who feel that actually they would feel more comfortable if they had some cross-sex hormones but they don’t want any surgery for example.”

“I think it would be fair to say that this is a developing language, the non-binary language, we’re all learning along the way.”

From Tumblr?

It is extremely worrying that the Director of the UK’s main gender clinic talks of biological sex as a ‘pre-conceived idea’ that is up for challenge. If we don’t distinguish between sex and gender, then ‘non-binary’ leads to the hormones-but-not-surgery choice flagged up here, as young people are led to believe that being somewhere on the spectrum between masculine and feminine requires bodily changes.  Who is going to tell young people the secret that all human beings are ‘non-binary;’ that none of us are 100% stereotypes and that being human requires no labels and no medical interventions?

Who is going to speak about this issue without that patronising and indulgent ‘Look what these modern young people are doing!’ tone, and actually give them some facts, both about biology and the risks of online indoctrination into faith-based beliefs?

This is the BBC’s policy on the duty for impartiality on controversial subjects which we have used in writing our complaint. There is a template letter here, please take a moment to copy and paste (including your own comments if you have time) and submit to BBC Complaints. Thank you.

6 Comments

  • petuniacat Reply

    Goodnight! What is wrong with these people? There was an article just the other day in the Telegraph maybe, about some guy with a rubber dog suit who has now completely changed his life to “being” a dog. It’s a fetish suit. The article was all about how interesting it is that some people ‘live as dogs’ now. Because it’s their true identity. WTF?!

    The BBC is horribly damaging its reputation with this behavior. This whole social phenomenon is like the alien abduction therapy cults from the 90s. With the exception that everyone viewed them with contempt.

    It sounds like “non-binary” is the deliberately confusing cover story for those male fetishists who want to take oestrogen because they think it’s going to help them get off more but have no intention of having surgery which would alter their sexual functioning. The men with breasts and a penis. The hallmark of the tranny porn and prostitution subculture of the 1970s. That’s who they are and they want that protected under the law. (PS sorry to be gross but that really does seem to be what this is about.)

    Dr. Polly Carmichael will be struck off. You heard it here first. 😊

  • Sylvie Reply

    Thank you for the template letter. It’s strange the BBC are pushing this one sided stuff so hard, without any attempt at balance whatsoever, and in the process neglecting their own “duty to apply impartiality”.

    Also – why do the Dr’s at that clinic all waffle such meaningless drivel? I hope something causes that place to be audited/regulated, and soon.

  • Gender Critical Dad Reply

    Complained to BBC:

    Your program repeated the doctrine of transgender and gender identiy as if it was establish scientific fact and not at highly political doctrine.

    The was no mention of the untested, off label nature of the drug treatments, The experimental high risk nature of surgery was not mentioned. The was no questioning the assumption that young peoples feeling of unease with the constraints imposed on them by other peoples ideas of gender is caused by them having the ‘wrong body’ and not by the injustice of those constraints.

    The was no questions raised of the homophobic implications of telling young people, that if they don’t comply with the behaviour norms of straight gender norms then they must need to change their bodies to the opposite gender, or become some new novel non binary gender and not just a girl who can’t be bothered with make-up or likes climbing trees or a boy who is flamboyant or caring or even just gay or lesbian.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *